You can use a shorter clause after a noun: the people waiting outside, the letter sent yesterday. An -ing form usually has an active meaning; a past participle usually has a passive meaning. Check who does the action and whether the shorter version keeps your meaning.
A relative clause gives information about a noun. The full clauses below have a relative pronoun such as who, which or that and a verb with tense. A reduced relative clause can use a participle instead. A participle is a verb form such as waiting, repaired or written.
| Full relative clause | Shorter version |
|---|---|
| The visitors who are waiting outside have tickets. | The visitors waiting outside have tickets. |
| The parcel that was delivered this morning is for you. | The parcel delivered this morning is for you. |
Keep the shorter clause next to the noun it describes. In the first example, waiting describes the visitors. In the second, delivered describes the parcel. The whole sentence still needs its main verb: have or is.
Use an -ing participle when the noun does the action. You can remove who, which or that and a form of be from a continuous relative clause.
An -ing clause can also describe a general activity. It does not always mean that something is happening right now.
The -ing form does not show tense by itself. Use the sentence and context to understand the time.
Use a past participle when the noun receives the action. The past participle ends in -ed for regular verbs, such as repaired. Irregular forms include written, made and sent. It is not simply a past-tense ending.
| Active: the noun does it | Passive: someone does it to the noun |
|---|---|
| the workers painting the door | the door painted by the workers |
| the neighbours inviting us | the neighbours invited by us |
A past participle does not give a precise time by itself. In the first example, last week supplies the time. Keep time expressions when your reader needs them.
To keep a continuous passive meaning, use being + past participle. The noun receives an action that is in progress in the situation.
Compare the road widened last year with the road being widened now. The first describes the result of earlier work; the second describes work in progress. Do not drop being if that would change the meaning you need.
For the active and passive participle patterns above, the noun before the clause corresponds to its subject. With a passive verb, that subject receives the action.
| Full clause | What can you do? |
|---|---|
| the engineer who is inspecting the lift | the engineer inspecting the lift |
| the lift which is being inspected | the lift being inspected |
| the engineer who we hired | the engineer we hired |
In the last row, we is the subject of hired. The engineer is its object. Leaving out who is possible, but that is object-pronoun omission, not a change to an -ing clause. The engineer hiring would mean that the engineer does the hiring. See Leaving out the relative pronoun: the people we met.
These noun descriptions are different from an introductory participle clause such as Walking home, I saw a fox. Here the description follows its own noun. It does not have to describe the main-clause subject: I thanked the engineer inspecting the lift.
A shorter clause must preserve the meaning, not just save words. Keep a full relative clause when its tense or other wording makes an important distinction.
This identifies her through a completed event. The passenger losing her passport suggests an event in progress, so it is not the same description. Keep who lost for the intended meaning.
Do not use having + past participle as an automatic replacement for a perfect relative clause. Perfect participles are generally not used in this noun-description pattern. They have other uses in Past and perfect participle clauses: invited, having checked.
Some full clauses with be can become a shorter description without a participle. Remove both the relative pronoun and be when the remaining words work as a description after the noun.
You can also put a noun phrase after a name to add extra information. A noun phrase is a noun with words that belong to it. Keep commas around the extra information when the main sentence continues.
A participle clause can add extra information too. Use commas for that meaning, as you would with a full non-defining relative clause.
After expressions such as the first, the last or the only followed by a noun, a to-infinitive can describe the person or thing. This is another non-finite pattern, not an -ing form.
You can use to have + past participle to mark an earlier completed action.
These shorter descriptions can make writing more concise. They are useful in academic writing, but a full relative clause is still an option. Choose the version that keeps your meaning clear. Do not remove a useful tense distinction merely to make a sentence shorter.
✗The visitor who waiting outside has a ticket.
✓The visitor waiting outside has a ticket.
Remove who as well as is, or keep the full form who is waiting.
✗The report which prepared by our team is ready.
✓The report prepared by our team is ready.
Remove which and was together, or keep which was prepared.
✗The road being widen will reopen soon.
✓The road being widened will reopen soon.
Being needs the past participle widened in this passive pattern.
✗Marta was the first volunteer to arrived.
✓Marta was the first volunteer to arrive.
Use the base form after to, not the past form.
See Defining relative clauses: who, which, that and Non-defining relative clauses: extra information with commas for full clauses and commas, Leaving out the relative pronoun: the people we met for leaving out an object pronoun, and Past and perfect participle clauses: invited, having checked for other participle-clause patterns.
Eight questions. Choose one answer for each.